Model

Gemini (Default)

Example input

[visible_behavior]: My team says they want better communication, but everyone avoids hard conversations and decisions get delayed.  
[stated_incentive]: “We value transparency and open dialogue.”  
[context]: A mid‑size team where conflict is quietly punished and harmony is rewarded.  
[question]: What incentive structure is producing this pattern?

Example output

Visible Behavior: The team consistently avoids difficult conversations, leading to delays and unresolved issues.  
Stated Incentive: “We value transparency and open dialogue.”  
Revealed Incentive: The system rewards harmony, non‑disruption, and emotional safety over clarity or truth. Speaking up carries social cost; silence carries none.  
Detected Geometry: A signaling‑driven equilibrium where “being agreeable” is the rewarded behavior, and candor is structurally punished.  
Verification (LUCAS):  
• Physicality: Avoidance is observable.  
• Logic: If candor is punished, silence is rational.  
• Agency: No individual can change this without coordinated support.  
Navigation: The system must shift the reward structure so that clarity is socially safe and silence is no longer the lowest‑cost strategy.